RIWAYA NA BURUDANI: Liquid interface in relation to surface

Liquid interface in relation to surface:

The regions of physical world that lie between two distinct and identiﬁable phases of matter, that region of space in which the system as a whole undergoes a transition from one phase to another.
Atoms and molecules at surfaces and interfaces possess energies significantly different from those of the same species in the bulk phase.

Generally when two / more phases exist together, the boundary between them is termed an interface. Surface is usually reserved for the region between a condensed phase (liquid or solid) and a gas phase or vacuum, while the interface is normally applied to the region between two condensed phases i.e. solid-solid, solid-liquid and liquid-liquid (immiscible), but gas-gas dose not have surface or interface.

Interfacial Phenomena

When phases exist together, the boundary between two of them is termed an interface. The properties of the molecules forming the interface are often sufficiently from those in the bulk of each phase that they are referred to as forming an interfacial phase. Several types of interface can exist, depending on whether the two adjacent phases are in the solid, liquid or gaseous state. For convenience, we shall divide these various combinations into two groups, namely liquid interfaces and solid interfaces.

Liquid Interfaces

Surface and Interfacial Tension Surface: The term surface is customarily used when referring to either a gas-solid or a gas-liquid interface. “Every surface is an interface.” Surface tension- a force pulling the molecules of the interface together resulting in a contracted surface.- Force per unit area applied parallel to the surface. Unit in dynes/cm or N/m

Interfacial tension Is the force per unit length existing at the interface between two immiscible liquid phases and like surface tension, has the units of dyne/cm. Surface Free energy – increase in energy of the liquid and the surface of the liquid increase. work must be done to increase liquid surface. γ – surface tension or surface free energy per unit surface. Surface Free energy W=γ ∆A where W is work done or surface free energy increase express in ergs(dyne cm); γ is surface tension in dynes/cm and ∆ A is increase in are in cm sq. What in the work required to increase area of a liquid droplet by 10 cm sq if the surface tension is 49 dynes/cm? W = 49 dynes/cm x 10 cm sq = 490 ergs

Work of adhesion(Wa), which is the energy required to break the attraction between the unlike molecules.(water to oil). Work of cohesion(Wc), required to separate the molecules of the spreading liquid so that it can flow over the sublayer.(oil to oil and water to water). Spreading of oil to water occurs if the work of adhesion is greater than the work of cohesion.

Spreading coefficient(S) – difference between Wa and Wc.Positive S – if oil spreads over a water surface.

When a drop of oil is added on the surface of water, three things may happen:

1. The drop may spread as a thin film on the surface of water.(positve S)

2. It may form a liquid lens if the oil cannot spread on the surface of water.(negative S)

3. The drop may spread as a monolayer film with areas that are identified as lenses.

Wettability and its effect in reservoir:

Wettability is the tendency of one fluid to spread on, or adhere to, a solid surface in the presence of other immiscible fluids in reservoir rock. Wettability refers to the interaction between fluid and solid phases. In a reservoir rock the liquid phase can be water or oil or gas, and the solid phase is the rock mineral assemblage. Wettability is defined by the contact angle of the fluid with the solid phase. Is the ability of liquid to spread over the surface of a solid under the action of molecular force. Wettability is the tendency of a reservoir rock surface to preferentially contact a particular fluid in a multiphase or two-phase fluid system.

Wettability is the ability of a liquid to maintain contact with a solid surface, and it is controlled by the balance between the intermolecular interactions of adhesive type (liquid to surface) and cohesive type (liquid to liquid). Is the ability of a solid surface to reduce the surface tension of a liquid in contact with it such that it spreads over the surface and wets it.

Contact angle

Angle of contact : Is the angle formed between the surface of a solid and the tangent to the surface of the liquid drop at the point of contact with the solid by convention, the contact angle (θ) is measured through the denser phase and ranges from 0º to 180º.

Fig. 2	Contact angle	Degree of wetting	Interaction strength
Fig. 2	Contact angle	Degree of wetting	Solid–liquid	Liquid–liquid
S	θ = 0	Perfect wetting	Strong	Weak
C	0 < θ < 90°	High wettability	Strong	Strong
C	0 < θ < 90°	High wettability	Weak	Weak
B	90° ≤ θ < 180°	Low wettability	Weak	Strong
A	θ = 180°	Perfectly non-wetting	Weak	Strong

The conventional means of measuring the reservoir rock wetting state is by contact angle measurement of an oil droplet on the rock. Water-wet if the contact angle is less than 90; oil-wet if the contact angle is larger than 90; intermediate wet if the contact angle is ~90. The reservoir wetting state may further be divided into strongly-water-wet, weakly-water-wet, strongly-oil-wet and weakly-oil-wet.

A contact angle less than 90° (low contact angle) usually indicates that wetting of the surface is very favorable, and the fluid will spread over a large area of the surface. Contact angles greater than 90° (high contact angle) generally means that wetting of the surface is unfavorable, so the fluid will minimize contact with the surface and form a compact liquid droplet.

One of the most obvious limitations of wettability characterization using contact angle measurement is the absence of a standard reference. Consequently, except at the end point wetting states, the classification of wetting state from contact angle measurement is arbitrary and subjective. Another important limitation of the contact angle method is that the required length of equilibration time cannot be reproduced in the lab. This may lead to problems such as erroneous classification of wetting state and sometimes to reproducibility issues.

WETTABILITY CLASSIFICATION

· Strongly oil- or water-wetting

· Neutral wettability – no preferential wettability to either water or oil in the pores

· Fractional wettability – reservoir that has local areas that are strongly oil-wet, whereas most of the reservoir is strongly water-wet. - Occurs where reservoir rock have variable mineral composition and surface chemistry

· Mixed wettability – smaller pores area water-wet are filled with water, whereas larger pores are oil-wet and filled with oil. - Residual oil saturation is low. - Occurs where oil with polar organic compounds invades a water-wet rock saturated with brine

Effects of wettability

· Effects of wettability on relative permeability

Wettability affects relative permeability because it is a major factor in the control of the location, flow, and distribution of fluids in a porous medium. Typically, as the system becomes more oil-wet, the water relative permeability increases and the oil relative permeability decreases. The more oil-wet the rock, the higher the water saturation positioned in the center of the pores competing with the oil in the most permeable pathways, reducing the relative permeability to oil, and increasing the relative permeability to water. Therefore, wettability alteration to more oil-wet due to near well-bore asphaltene deposition can hinder oil production.

· Effect of Wettability on Reservoir Parameters

The wettability of the rock/fluid system is important because it is a major factor controlling the location, flow, and distribution of fluids in a reservoir. Wettability, in petrophysical interpretations affect water saturation calculation and in reservoir condition and core analysis experiments, affects capillary pressure, relative permeability, residual oil saturation, water-flood behavior, and simulated recovery processes.

· Effect of Wettability on OOIP and Reserve Estimations

Estimations of reserves, especially by the volumetric method, are usually undertaken assuming water-wet conditions. Wettability can have a dramatic effect on the estimation of OOIP from initial volumetric to more detailed production performance predictions. Petrophysical data is of primary importance to the estimation of volumetric OOIP. Using common parameters for a water-wet reservoir in an oil-wet reservoir could lead to an over-estimation of oil-in-place.

· Effect of Wettability on capillary pressure:

The capillary pressure is the difference in pressure across the interface between two phases, is dependent on the interfacial tension, pore size, and wetting angle. Capillary pressure is the most fundamental rock/fluid property in multiphase flow, just as porosity and permeability are for single phase flow in oil and gas reservoirs. Capillary pressure curves directly determine the irreducible water saturation, residual oil saturation, and rock wettability and can be used to determine water oil contact point and approximate oil recovery. Due to the capillary pressure dependence on water saturation, the effect of wettability alteration on reserve estimation through the initial water saturation is shown. The implications for oil recovery prediction and reservoir management are discussed.

· Effect of Wettability on oil recovery

Using different surfactants to deliberately improve oil recovery; however, the literature is sparse on wettability alteration that results from contact with the components of corrosion inhibitors or paints; the focus of this study.

Water flood

It has long been known that wettability is a primary determinant of waterflood recovery efficiency. Strongly oil-wet reservoirs give the least waterflood oil recovery and the best recovery appears to be the mixed-wet reservoir, particularly where surface film drainage mechanism is also observed. While most researchers are in agreement on the least waterflood oil recovery for oil-wet reservoirs, there is a lack of consensus as to the wetting condition for maximum oil recovery.

Gas flood

Gas flood recovery efficiency also depends on reservoir wettability as well as the spreading coefficient. The best gas flood oil recovery was observed for oil-wet reservoirs particularly for tertiary recovery process i.e. at waterflood oil saturation. For gasfloods in secondary recovery processes, the mixed-wet and water-wet systems resulted in higher recoveries.

IMPLICATIONS OF WETTABILITY

· Primary oil recovery is affected by the wettability of the system.

· A water-wet system will exhibit greater primary oil recovery.

· Oil recovery under waterflooding is affected by the wettability of the system.

· A water-wet system will exhibit greater oil recovery under waterflooding.

WETTABILITY AFFECTS:

· Capillary Pressure

· Irreducible water saturation

· Residual oil and water saturations

· Relative permeability

· Electrical properties

Skin effect

Skin effect is the phenomena of additional resistivity arising in bottom-hole formation zone and in face area to fluid influx into the well. Skin-effect results from production-induced impact on the bottom-hole formation zone when completing the well. Due to that, gas-dynamic features of the bottom-hole zone differ from the other part of the pay zone.

Skin-effect provides quantitative characteristic of the difference between equivalent permeability of the bottom-hole zone of the well from the other part of the drainage area. It reflects the quality of completion job dependent on the following factors: degree of reservoir contamination with drilling mud and flushing sludge; nature and quality of reservoir connection with the wellbore; type and efficiency of fluid influx into the well (enhanced oil recovery), etc.

The numerical value is defined by gas-dynamic methods of well survey as an outcome of processing the bottom-hole build-up and stabilization curves. Positive skin-effect values (above zero) indicate poor quality of completion. Negative skin-effect values (below zero) normally are associated with production-induced generation of caverns, fissures and channels in the bottom-hole zone.

Skin effect is a side effect that affected (or rather, damaged) formation rocks near the wellbore as a result of drilling activities performed on the wellbore. Skin is the formation damage caused by drilling & completions. When a well is drilled, drilling muds must be circulating to the surface. This is done because drilling muds can cool the bit, remove cuttings, control formation pressure, etc. The drilling muds cause contaminations in the permeable area around the wellbore, thus reducing the permeability in that area. The reduction in permeability near the wellbore can be quantified by a dimensionless term called “skin”.

· If the value of skin is positive, the formation is damaged.

· If the value of skin is negative, the formation is stimulated.

· If the value of skin is 0, there is nothing happens to the formation.

Rock as a base ability to move fluid (liquid or gas) through it that varies from rock to rock. When a well is drilled, drilling muds are used to circulate the hole to clean out the cuttings (rock chips) and also to put applied pressure on the reservoir to prevent a blowout (the uncontrolled release of oil or gas up the hole). This drilling mud induces a ‘damage’ in the near well bore area caused by partial clogging of the pores that oil and gas flow through. That damage is called ‘skin damage’.

Skin or skin effect in reservoir engineering is reduced permeability around the near well bore area due to the drilling process. This is usually caused by the invasion of the mud filtrate into the pores of the reservoir rock. It reduces the production potential of the well if not bypassed. Good drilling practise can reduce the invasion zone and there are several wellbore clean up chemicals that can reduce the skin effect

Imbibition and drainage strategies

Imbibition is a fluid flow process in which the saturation of the wetting phase increases and the nonwetting phase saturation decreases. (e.g., waterflood of an oil reservoir that is water-wet).

Mobility of wetting phase increases as wetting phase saturation increases. Mobility is the fraction of total flow capacity for a particular phase.

Water-wet reservoir, imbibition

· Water will occupy the smallest pores

· Water will wet the circumference of most larger pores

· In pores having high oil saturation, oil rests on a water film

Imbibition - If a water-wet rock saturated with oil is placed in water, it will imbibe water into the smallest pores, displacing oil

Oil-wet reservoir, imbibition

· Oil will occupy the smallest pores

· Oil will wet the circumference of most larger pores

· In pores having high water saturation, water rests on a water film

Imbibition - If an oil-wet rock saturated with water is placed in oil, it will imbibe oil into the smallest pores, displacing water e.g., Oil-wet reservoir – accumulation of oil in trap

If a water-wet rock saturated with oil is placed in water, it will imbibe water into the smallest pores, displacing oil. If an oil-wet rock saturated with water is placed in oil, it will imbibe oil into the smallest pores, displacing water.

Drainage is a fluid flow process in which the saturation of the nonwetting phase increases.

Mobility of nonwetting fluid phase increases as nonwetting phase saturation increases e.g., waterflood of an oil reservoir that is oil wet Gas injection in an oil or water wet reservoir. Pressure maintenance or gas cycling by gas injection in a retrograde condensate reservoir. A water-wet reservoir that accumulation of oil or gas in a trap does so by drainage.

Primary and waterflood oil recovery is affected by the wettability of the system. A water-wet system will exhibit greater primary oil recovery.

Reservoir energy its type and its uses

Reservoir energy is the energy of the reservoir bed and of the embedded fluid (oil, water, gas) which are stressed under the effect of rock pressure and reservoir pressure.

The more gases are dissolved in oil, the higher is the reservoir energy resource. When gas or fluid is recovered from the reservoir, the reservoir energy resource is spent on fluids movement and on overcoming the forces counteracting this movement (internal friction forces of fluids and gases and their friction on the rock, as well as capillary forces).

Oil and gas movement in the reservoir is usually defined by various types of reservoir energy simultaneously (compressed formation and fluids tension and energy defined by oil gravity are always shown). Depending on geological features and the conditions of field development that or another type of energy shall prevail. According to the type of energy defining movement of gas and fluids to producing fields, different modes of operation are set for oil and gas deposits.

Main types of reservoir energy:

produced water discharge,
free gas and gas emitted when the pressure of the gas dissolved in oil is lowered,
compressed formation and fluids tension,
discharge energy defined by oil gravity.

Uses of reservoir energy

Reservoir energy resource spent during field development may be restored due to natural influx of water from surface sources into the pay zone (in outcrop locations), from aquifer (especially when external reservoir boundary is practically unlimited and has good hydro-dynamic connections with oil-saturated reservoirs) or by way of artificial injection of water, gas or other agent displacing reservoir fluid. Reservoir energy balance (ration of energy spent on production and external energy flowing into the reservoir) is one of the crucial parameters of oil field development. It is characterized by the difference between current and initial reservoir pressure, as well as by current and accumulated compensation of recovered fluid by injected working agent.

Reference

P. H. Valvatne and M. J. Blunt, “Predictive pore-scale modeling of two-phase flow in mixed wet media,” Water Resources Research, vol. 40, no. 7, Article ID W07406, 2004. View at Publisher

S. AL-Sayari and M. Blunt, “The Effect of wettability on relative permeability, capillary pressure, electrical resistivity and NMR,” in Benchmark Experiments on Multiphase Flow, Imperial College of London, 2012. View at Google Scholar

M. T. Al-Garni and B. D. Al-Anazi, “Investigation of wettability effects on capillary pressure, and irreducible saturation for Saudi crude oils, using rock centrifuge,” Oil and Gas Business, 2008. View at Google Scholar

D. P. Green, J. R. Dick, M. McAloon, P. F. D. J. Cano-Barrita, J. Burger, and B. Balcom, “Oil/water imbibition and drainage capillary pressure determined by MRI on a wide sampling of rocks,” in Proceedings of the 22nd International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 2008.

J. Chen, G. J. Hirasaki, and M. Flaum, “NMR wettability indices: effect of OBM on wettability and NMR responses,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 52, no. 1–4, pp. 161–171, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus

D. M. O'Carroll, L. M. Abriola, C. A. Polityka, S. A. Bradford, and A. H. Demond, “Prediction of two-phase capillary pressure-saturation relationships in fractional wettability systems,” Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 247–270, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus

S. Békri, C. Nardi, and O. Vizika, “Effect of wettability on the petrophysical parameters of vuggy carbonates: network modeling investigation,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts held in Abu Dhabi, UAE, October 2004.

K. Li and A. Firoozabadi, “Experimental study of wettability alteration to preferential gas-wetting in porous media and its effects,” SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 139–149, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus

M.-H. Hui and M. J. Blunt, “Effects of wettability on three-phase flow in porous media,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 104, no. 16, pp. 3833–3845, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus

Wunderlich, R.W.: “Obtaining Samples with Preserved Wettability,” Interfacial Phenomena in Oil Recovery, N.R. Morrow (ed.), Marcell Dekker, New York City (1990) 289-318

Brown, R.J. & Fatt, I.: “Measurements of Fractional Wettability of Oilfield Rocks by Nuclear Magnetic Relaxation Method,”Trans., AIME (1956) Vol. 207, 262-264